Scheimpflug Corneal Tomography Anterior Chamber Depth in Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty Recipients.

PURPOSE: Our study investigates whether preoperative anterior chamber depth (ACD) measured by Scheimpflug tomography could serve as a potential predictor of graft failure in eyes undergoing Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK). METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on patients who underwent primary or repeat DSEK between January 2020 and August 2021 at Bascom Palmer Eye Institute. Charts from 378 primary and 192 repeat DSEK patients were reviewed and ultimately 47 primary and 21 repeat DSEK patients met criteria for inclusion. Data collection included demographics, preoperative ACD, best-corrected visual acuity, and length of follow-up. RESULTS: Demographics were similar between groups, and there was no significant difference in the average best-corrected visual acuity between the single and repeat DSEK groups preoperatively. Baseline preoperative ACD was greatest in the single DSEK group (3.51 ± 0.90 mm) when compared to baseline preoperative ACD in the repeat DSEK group (3.01 ± 0.67 mm, P = 0.003). The preoperative mean ACD was smallest in the repeat DSEK group before the second DSEK (2.94 ± 0.48 mm, P = 0.001). Preoperative baseline ACD was the only variable to affect graft survival time significantly (P = 0.012). The incidence of glaucoma diagnosis was similar in both groups (42.5% vs. 42.8%, P = 0.471). The diagnosis of glaucoma and presence of incisional glaucoma surgery did not affect the graft survival time (P = 0.129, P = 0.559) or need for repeat DSEK. CONCLUSIONS: Smaller baseline preoperative Scheimpflug ACD measurement may be a possible predictor of the need for repeat DSEK. Our study found that Scheimpflug ACD decreases with subsequent DSEK failure.

The inflammasome pathway: A key player in ocular surface and anterior segment diseases.

Inflammasomes are multicomplex molecular regulators with an emerging importance in regulating ocular surface and anterior segment health and disease. Key components found in the eye include NF-κB, NLRP3, NLRC4, NLRP6, ASC, IL-1ß, IL-18, and caspase-1. The role of NLRP1, NLRC4, AIM2, and NLRP3 inflammasomes in the pathogenesis of infectious ulcers, DED, uveitis, glaucoma, corneal edema, and other diseases is being studied with many developments. Attenuation of these diseases has been explored by blocking various molecules along the inflammasome pathway with agents like NAC, polydatin, calcitriol, glyburide, YVAD, and disulfiram. We provide a background on the inflammasome pathway as it relates to the ocular surface and anterior segment of the eye, discuss the role of inflammasomes in the above diseases in animals and humans, investigate new therapeutic targets, and explore the efficacy of new anti-inflammasome therapies.

Cost of Ranibizumab Port Delivery System vs Intravitreal Injections for Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Importance: The study team investigated costs associated with the ranibizumab port delivery system (PDS) for neovascular age-related macular (nAMD), an alternative to conventional intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections. Objective: To investigate costs of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections vs ranibizumab PDS for patients with neovascular AMD (nAMD). Design, Setting, and Participants: This cost analysis used trial data and Medicare reimbursement rates and included patients with nAMD who were receiving ranibizumab, aflibercept, bevacizumab injections, or ranibizumab PDS. Main Outcomes and Measures: The number of intravitreal ranibizumab, aflibercept, and bevacizumab injections to break even with costs of ranibizumab PDS. Total direct medical costs over 1 year and 5 years for the ranibizumab PDS arm with refills at fixed 6-month intervals compared with monthly or bimonthly injections were calculated using Medicare rates. Scenario and sensitivity analyses accounted for uncertainty and variation. Results: The mean (SD) number of ranibizumab, aflibercept, and bevacizumab injections to break even with the cost of ranibizumab PDS with 1 refill was 10.8 (1.3), 9.3 (1.1), and 34.5 (4.2), respectively. Ranibizumab PDS with fixed 6-month refills over 1 year cost $21 016 ($2102). Comparatively, monthly intravitreal ranibizumab cost $1943 (95% CI, -$3047 to $6932; P = .34) more, aflibercept cost $5702 (95% CI, $253-$11 151; P = .04) more, and bevacizumab cost $16 732 (95% CI, -$20 170 to -$13 294, P < .001) less. For bimonthly injections, aflibercept cost $7658 (95% CI, -$11 649.52 to -$3665.61; P = .006) less. Over 5 years, monthly intravitreal ranibizumab projected to cost $25 581 (95% CI, $2275-$48 887; P = .04) more, aflibercept cost $44 374 (95% CI, $18 623-$70 125; P = .008) more, and bevacizumab cost $67 793 (95% CI, -$82 501 to -$53 085; P < .001) less than PDS with fixed refills (mean [SD] cost, $89 218 [$8921]). For bimonthly injections, aflibercept cost $22 422 (95% CI, -$40 287 to -$45,56; P = .03) less. In scenario analyses, ranibizumab PDS with refills as needed offered cost savings compared with real-world intravitreal ranibizumab or aflibercept use at 5 years but not at 1 year. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cost analysis, ranibizumab PDS with 1 refill cost more than intravitreal ranibizumab or aflibercept injections if less than or equal to approximately 11 or 10 injections, respectively, are required within the first year. Long term, if less than 4.4 and 3.8 injections are needed per refill, intravitreal ranibizumab and aflibercept is lower cost. Ranibizumab PDS costs more than intravitreal bevacizumab injections throughout scenarios.

Impact of Air Pollution and Weather on Dry Eye.

Air pollution has broad effects on human health involving many organ systems. The ocular surface is an excellent model with which to study the effects of air pollution on human health as it is in constant contact with the environment, and it is directly accessible, facilitating disease monitoring. Effects of air pollutants on the ocular surface typically manifest as dry eye (DE) symptoms and signs. In this review, we break down air pollution into particulate matter (organic and inorganic) and gaseous compounds and summarize the literature regarding effects of various exposures on DE. Additionally, we examine the effects of weather (relative humidity, temperature) on DE symptoms and signs. To do so, we conducted a PubMed search using key terms to summarize the existing literature on the effects of air pollution and weather on DE. While we tried to focus on the effect of specific exposures on specific aspects of DE, environmental conditions are often studied concomitantly, and thus, there are unavoidable interactions between our variables of interest. Overall, we found that air pollution and weather conditions have differential adverse effects on DE symptoms and signs. We discuss these findings and potential mitigation strategies, such as air purifiers, air humidifiers, and plants, that may be instituted as treatments at an individual level to address environmental contributors to DE.